Ascension Island and the ITCZ



“Considering that these islands are placed directly under the equator, the climate is far from being excessively hot; this seems chiefly caused by the singularly low temperature of the surrounding water, brought here by the great southern Polar current.. very little rain falls, and even then it is irregular.” – Darwin (Voyage of the Beagle) describing the climate of the Galapagos.

Ascension Island is located in the tropical South Atlantic (8^oS). A visitor expecting to find lush tropical vegetation is suprised, just as Darwin was surprised by the climate of the Galapagos.  Saint Helena, 1300km to the South-West (16^oS) is also dry. So too is the island of Santiago, Capo Verde 2700km to the North (15^oN). On a recent trip to these islands I  was left wondering where the tropical rainfall was.

Rendered by

Tropical rainfall is tied to the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) where trade winds from Northern and Southern hemispheres (NH & SH) converge. Convergence implies uplift and uplift of moist air produces convective rainfall. ITCZ tends to follow maximum sunshine seasonally about the equator, which explains the timing of the wet season at a given location. This begs the question, why are some tropical oceanic islands almost entirely dry while others at similar latitude are very wet?

I used historical atmospheric circulation data from ERA-interim reanalysis to try to shed light on this puzzle.  Mean monthly divergence of surface (10m) wind field was computed at 0.75^o resolution based on the years 1979-2015. The ITCZ corresponds to the band of strongly negative divergence (convergence) near the equator (in mathematical notation \bf{\nabla} \cdot \bf{U} < 0).


ITCZ moves with seasons as expected. However ERA data show that over much of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, it is (a) narrow, and (b) shifted significantly towards the NH (by about 5^o). This is why the convergence manages to miss Capo Verde, Ascension and Saint Helena almost entirely which accounts for the surprisingly dry climate of these islands. On the other hand, ITCZ dips far enough South to bring heavy rain to Fernando de Noronha (3^oS off the coast of Brazil) during April.

The large NH bias of ITCZ[1] is a fundamental fact of the climate system. For example, it is a factor in the rarity of hurricanes in the SH. NH bias is believed to be related to the observation that SH is \approx1.25^oC cooler than NH, which is in turn related to imbalance of ocean heat transport between hemispheres.

[1] Why the ITCZ Is Mostly North of the Equator?


1 Comment

  1. Hi Joe,

    It is great to see you are still active. I posted a question on your thread on the Australian wind energy study asking if your journal paper on that excellent study is still progressing and if so what is the status, or if you have given up on it. It was an excellent study and it would be very valuable to have it published in the peer reviewed literature as you did for you EirGrid study. I hope you are still proceeding with it. By the way, yesterday, the entire South Australian electricity system was blacked out as a result of storms.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.